Work in progress. Maintainer Mode changes every day: pages, numbers and links can change or break. Tell us what is wrong or missing.

Add SerenityOS as target #186484

open emilytrau wants to merge into master · opened 4y ago

Review on GitHub Open on GitHub

About

State

open

Author

emilytrau member

Base

master

Labels

8.has: package (new)2.status: merge conflict10.rebuild-linux: 1-1010.rebuild-darwin: 06.topic: stdenv2.status: stale6.topic: exotic

Age

4y ago, updated 2y ago

Size

+489 −19 in 22 files

Checks

no checks reported

Mergeable

not known yet

AI use

none disclosed in the last commit or the description

In Maintainer Mode

Queue

in no queue

Why not ready

its author is not listed: credit from 0 of 3 authors

Approved head

none

Credit earned

sternenseemann · review 4y ago · 0.00

ADKaster · review 4y ago · 0.00

alex-ameen · review 4y ago · 0.00

ajs124 · review 4y ago · 0.00

alyssais · review 3y ago · 0.00

How credit works

What it touches

bash risk 0 13 4

maintainers infinisil, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams Security review

bashFHS risk 0 12 1

maintainers infinisil, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams Security review

bashInteractive risk 0 12 1

maintainers infinisil, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams Security review

bashInteractiveFHS risk 0 12 1

maintainers infinisil, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams Security review

bashNonInteractive risk 0 13 4

maintainers infinisil, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams Security review

bintools risk 0 30 5

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

bintools-unwrapped risk 8 upstream 2.47 6 3

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

bintoolsNoLibc risk 0 30 5

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

binutils risk 0 32 6

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

binutils-unwrapped risk 8 upstream 2.47 6 2

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

binutils-unwrapped-all-targets risk 8 upstream 2.47 6 3

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

binutilsNoLibc risk 0 30 5

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

binutils_nogold risk 0 30 5

maintainers Ericson2314, lovesegfault

gcc-unwrapped risk 0 38 2

maintainers vcunat, Ericson2314, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams GCC, Security review

gccForLibs risk 0 38 2

maintainers vcunat, Ericson2314, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams GCC, Security review

libgcc risk 0 40 3

maintainers vcunat, Ericson2314, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams GCC, Security review

libgccjit risk 0 38 3

maintainers vcunat, Ericson2314, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams GCC, Security review

mold risk 1 30 5

maintainers azahi

mold-wrapped risk 1 30 5

maintainers azahi

runtimeShellPackage risk 0 12 1

maintainers infinisil, balsoft, andir, pyrox0 · teams Security review

wild risk 0 30 5

maintainers RossSmyth

Description

The description could not be read: this server reads GitHub only for people who sign in (sign in). Read it on GitHub

Review checklist from CONTRIBUTING.md and pkgs/README.md

The commit messages follow the nixpkgs format, like hello: 2.12 -> 2.13 or nixos/nginx: fix the test. Guide
meta is complete: description, homepage, license, maintainers, mainProgram. Guide
Sources are fixed-output and pinned by a hash. No lib.fakeHash is left. Guide
A command-line tool has versionCheckHook, or another check that runs it. Guide
meta.platforms matches what upstream supports. Guide
The tests run: passthru.tests, the NixOS test of a module, or nixpkgs-review. Guide
AI use is disclosed with an Assisted-by: trailer. Guide

The title does not start with name:. AI use: none disclosed in the last commit or the description.

Review on GitHub Open on GitHub

Maintainer Mode posts nothing on nixpkgs. You leave your review on GitHub.

Files changed 22

The diff could not be read: this server reads GitHub only for people who sign in (sign in). Read it on GitHub

Reviews and comments

The conversation could not be read: this server reads GitHub only for people who sign in (sign in). The synced reviews, without their text:

sternenseemann commented 4y ago

ADKaster commented 4y ago

sternenseemann commented 4y ago

alex-ameen commented 4y ago

ajs124 commented 4y ago

alex-ameen commented 4y ago

alyssais commented 3y ago

alyssais changes requested 3y ago

alyssais commented 3y ago

alyssais commented 3y ago

The conversation on GitHub